ZFS vs. LVM: Side-by-Side Comparison

  • Post author:
  • Post last modified:May 8, 2023
  • Post category:Miscellaneous
  • Reading time:13 mins read

In this article, we will look at a side-by-side comparison of ZFS vs. LVM. ZFS and LVM are both filesystems that can be used in various operating systems, so selecting the correct option (especially since you have to do it upfront) is extremely important!

ZFS and LVM are storage management solutions, each with unique benefits. ZFS combines a file system and volume manager, offering advanced features like data integrity checks, snapshots, and built-in RAID support. LVM is a separate volume manager, providing flexibility in storage allocation without ZFS’s advanced features.

ZFS vs. LVM: Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureZFSLVM (Logical Volume Manager)
ArchitectureFile system and volume manager combinedVolume manager separate from the file system
Data IntegrityBuilt-in data integrity checks (checksums)Lacks built-in data integrity checks
SnapshotsEfficient snapshot supportSupports snapshots, but less efficient
DeduplicationBuilt-in data deduplicationLacks built-in deduplication
CompressionBuilt-in data compressionLacks built-in compression
RAID SupportBuilt-in RAID-Z supportRequires separate MD RAID for RAID configurations
ScalabilityPools can be easily expandedLess flexible in expanding storage
Cache and SSD SupportAdvanced caching with L2ARC and SLOG devicesLimited SSD caching support
EncryptionNative encryption supportLacks native encryption; relies on external tools
PerformanceGenerally better performance due to cachingGood performance, but lacks advanced caching options
ComplexityHigher learning curve, more complex setupSimpler setup and management

What are ZFS and LVM?

Before we get into a detailed ZFS vs. LVM comparison, let’s take a look at exactly what ZFS and LVM are.

ZFS Filesystem Overview

ZFS stands for Zettabyte File System and is a highly scalable file system originally developed by Sun Microsystems (now owned by Oracle) for the Solaris operating system. It is widely used for its data integrity, protection features, and massive storage capacity.

ZFS includes built-in RAID, data compression, deduplication, and snapshots, making it a powerful choice for large-scale data storage and management.

It has since been ported to other platforms, including FreeBSD and Linux through the OpenZFS project. ZFS is widely used and is viewed as one of the best filesystems you can use due to features like:

  • Copy-on-write (CoW) snapshots
  • End-to-end data integrity checks
  • Built-in RAID support
  • Data deduplication and compression

One of the most popular platforms to run ZFS on is TrueNAS Core or TrueNAS Scale. However, it’s supported on tons of other operating systems as well, such as Proxmox, Unraid (support coming soon), and more.

TrueNAS ZFS Pool. ZFS vs. LVM

LVM Overview

LVM (Logical Volume Manager) is not a file system itself but rather a storage management solution that works with file systems. It allows you to create, resize, and manage logical volumes, providing flexibility in storage allocation.

LVM operates at a layer above physical storage devices, which allows users to combine multiple disks or partitions into a single, larger virtual storage pool. This pool can then be divided into logical volumes, which can be formatted with a file system of your choice, such as Ext4 or XFS.

Here are some features of LVM:

  • Storage flexibility: Manage logical volumes, pool multiple physical devices, and support various file systems.
  • Enhanced functionality: Snapshots, striping, mirroring, and online resizing for improved storage management.
  • Easy volume management: Easily handle physical devices in the storage pool without downtime.

ZFS vs. LVM: Key Feature Comparison

A common question when setting up Proxmox is the correct storage type to use, with ZFS and LVM being common options. We’ll try and break down their key differences below!

proxmox storage options.

Storage Management and Flexibility

One of the main differences when looking at ZFS vs. LVM is their approach to storage management. ZFS is both a filesystem and a volume manager, whereas LVM is only a volume manager that can work with various filesystems.

ZFS Storage Management

ZFS uses a unified storage pool called the ZFS Storage Pool (zpool) to manage all storage devices. This simplifies storage management by treating all devices as a single, large storage pool. You can then create filesystems, or datasets within the zpool, each with its own settings and properties.

LVM Storage Management

LVM, on the other hand, allows you to create and manage logical volumes on your storage devices. You can then apply any supported filesystem to those logical volumes.

This provides flexibility in choosing the best filesystem for your specific needs and allows you to mix and match different filesystems within a single LVM setup.

Data Integrity

When looking at ZFS vs. LVM from a data integrity perspective, ZFS is simply better. ZFS uses end-to-end checksums, which allows it to detect and repair data corruption automatically.

LVM (being a volume manager) does not have any built-in data integrity features, so it relies on the underlying filesystem to handle data integrity.


Both ZFS and LVM offer snapshot capabilities, but their implementations are different. ZFS uses a copy-on-write (CoW) approach that allows for efficient and almost instant snapshots. You can also create and manage clones from these snapshots.

LVM also supports snapshots, but its snapshot implementation can be slower and less space-efficient than ZFS. This is because LVM uses a copy-on-write (CoW) approach at the block level, which can lead to more storage space being used when changes are made to the original volume after a snapshot is taken.


Comparing performance in ZFS vs. LVM can be difficult because a lot of the time, it depends on the underlying filesystem used with LVM (as it’s simply a volume manager).

Generally, ZFS is known for having great performance. However, LVM can provide great performance as well, especially when used with specific (good-performing) filesystems like XFS or Ext4.

RAID Support

ZFS has built-in RAID support with various RAID-Z levels (RAID-Z, RAID-Z2, and RAID-Z3). This allows you to have redundancy and data protection directly in the ZFS storage pool.

Redundancy1 disk2 disks3 disks
Data Loss Protection1 disk failure2 disk failures3 disk failures
Minimum Disks 3 disks4 disks5 disks
Usable Storage SpaceTotal disks minus 1Total disks minus 2Total disks minus 3

LVM does not offer RAID support. However, you can use LVM in conjunction with Linux’s built-in software RAID (mdadm) to achieve a similar level of redundancy and data protection.

ZFS vs. LVM: Which is Best for you?

When deciding between ZFS vs. LVM, the decision really comes down to the situation you’re in and how you’d like to approach it. However, we’ll try and break down some key points that can help you decide below.

Operating System Compatibility

If you’re using Linux, LVM is the more native choice and generally has better support from Linux distributions. ZFS, while available on Linux through the OpenZFS project, may require extra steps to set up and maintain.

Data Integrity and Redundancy

If data integrity and built-in RAID support are important, ZFS may be the better choice. However, if you prefer a more flexible approach that allows you to mix and match filesystems and RAID configurations, LVM (with an appropriate filesystem) and mdadm for RAID may be an option.

Resource Usage

ZFS can be more resource-intensive, specifically when it comes to RAM usage. Since LVM is a more lightweight solution, it may be a better fit for systems with limited resources.

truenas scale dashboard.

Usage and Management

LVM is tightly integrated with Linux and can be managed with familiar Linux tools and commands. ZFS has its own set of management tools and commands, which might have a steeper learning curve for those not comfortable with them.

Conclusion: ZFS vs. LVM

This article looked at ZFS vs. LVM to understand their key differences. Ultimately, one isn’t better than the other and it’s important to understand how they both work so that you can implement the correct solution based on the requirements gathered.

Thanks for checking out the article on ZFS vs. LVM! If you have any questions on ZFS vs. LVM, please leave them in the comments!

Please share if this helped you!


IT professional and creator of WunderTech. Passionate about NAS, Docker, virtualization, firewalls, self-hosted apps, and an avid home lab enthusiast.
You are currently viewing ZFS vs. LVM: Side-by-Side Comparison